Month: March 2024

Cultural Dysbiosis: A Personal Essay by Ruth Kettle-Frisby

Above photo: Ruth, far left, looking out at the view from Wennington Church.

We invited Havering local, environmental activist and writer Ruth Kettle-Frisby to write a guest blog article on DYSBIOSIS after attending some of our DYSBIOSIS Creative Nature Workshops in Havering this month. 

What is nature to me?

When I first saw the term Dysbiosis – the title of the creative workshops here in Havering by Daedalus Theatre Company – my mind began to juxtapose discordant thoughts that seemed nevertheless to harmonise. Funnily enough, it is this very paradox that encapsulates nature.

Nature functions to such a finely tuned degree that the earth spins on its axis around the precise gravitational force to sustain life; and this mechanical harmony extends to our localised experiences here on earth, which can be beautiful to behold.

There are few things I enjoy more than an enchanted stroll around Warley Place when it’s sprinkled with clumps of dewy snowdrops glistening in the morning sun, sporadically dissected by ancient trees, some even thriving in supine slumber after great storms…or treating fluffy ducklings, flapping feral pigeons, and tame grey squirrels to veritable feasts at Langtons Gardens on a crisp Spring afternoon: scenes of comical unrest annually reverberate from the resident cob, angrily chasing persistent Canada geese from the lake; loss and sadness rippling in the still air as it becomes apparent on returning children’s fingers, that numbers no longer add up, and he’s attacked some of his own cygnets.

Nature continues to inspire artists, photographers and musicians; it provides us with sustenance, shelter, oxygen and medicine; it grinds our remains deep into its geology, and it contains coded messages of hope, regeneration and resilience, much like the Gingko trees that survived after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Nature also has the ability to overwhelm with its might, brutality and caprice; blithely indifferent to some of our deepest instincts and desires.

In spite of our symbiosis with the rest of nature – to which we are intimately genetically connected – the dysbiosis we continue to wreak on our planetary ecosystems, with our continued burning of fossil fuels and so on, is destroying the delicate conditions that sustain a rich variety of life on Earth. 

Othering Nature and exploiting others

We often speak of ‘looking at’ nature, objectifying and othering it through a human lens; it’s as though life forms and processes in our ecology existed independently of each other. Although we live off and return to the earth – and breathe the air around us – we have distanced ourselves from assumptive ideas of ‘primitivism’ by disguising our natural interconnectivity in neatly folded plastic wrappers. 

The othering and politicising of nature in our language and our concepts can be found in the work of theologists and other thinkers, including social contract philosophers, who instilled fear of the ‘state of nature’ as something brutish that stands in conflict with civilised state control; contrasting nature with Western human rationality, as if human nature could achieve the paradoxical desire to transcend the rest of nature in order to conquer it. 

Our post-industrialist dependence on colonialist fossil fuel extraction and persistent burning has led big oil companies to maintain a culture of routinely poisoning the air we breathe, and to heat our shared habitat, which causes climate breakdown that is currently most severe in the Global South. This is making migration an increasing necessity for the survival of a variety of organisms, while pathological dysbiosis penetrates at biological levels with essential enzymes becoming denatured by climate change.

The Covid 19 pandemic tore across the globe; conflicts broke out in Kashmir, East Africa, and the Middle East, as well as the contrastingly highly publicised war in Ukraine; and billions of people have been impacted by floods, droughts and wildfires, always targeting the most marginalised people on the front lines first.

We are already struggling to cope with climate breakdown here in the UK. Parts of our local village of Wennngton were completely destroyed; homes and belongings were lost, and beloved pets and wildlife sadly killed. The UK wildfires of the summer of 2022 carried with them truths reverberating from Western colonialism with dysbiotic warnings, however invariably after such tragedies, those in power find ways to move the conversation along. This perpetuates cultural trends: after jolting reminders of our fragile mortalities, instead of becoming galvanised into action, we endeavour to reinter our dampened awareness that nature will transform and humble our own experiences. Keep calm and carry on, like zombies of convenience; living, polluting and voting, while women and girls of colour and disabled people suffer and die at the sharp end of climate breakdown. 

Kant thought that order in nature is the natural effect of our perceptual interaction with it. We are part of nature, and in perceiving it, we succeed in shaping it as it shapes our perceptions of it, creating a natural two-way symbiosis between our perceptual experience and reality. This is an interesting way of un-othering nature, and reconnecting with it conceptually at a metaphysical level, but the cultural story is very different.

The incoherence of selective narratives of dysbiosis

Stripping this down to logic, if nature is all that there is, then can it be ordered or disordered? Surely in the absence of any natural standard of orderliness beyond the socially constructed characteristics, disorder can only represent our perception in terms of reductive binaries that simply reveal truths about us and what we value. We separate flowers from weeds – or pets from pests and livestock – as wheat from chaff … nondisabled human worth from disabled lack of worth. This dehumanisation of people is a dangerous consequence of prejudiced perceptions of dysbiosis; fuelled by sustained, historically embedded power structures, they dominate the narrative to such a degree that they are sewn into the fabric of our basic, often unconscious assumptions.

My eldest daughter is six years old and has CDKL5: a neurodevelopmental genetic condition that is often referred to as ‘CDD’, standing for ‘CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder’. Non-disabled people taking for granted the working protein that was truncated for children like her does not justify the association of ‘deficiency’ and ‘disorder’ with human beings. When something is broken, we tend to fix it or throw it away; when children are labelled as ‘disordered’ by medical communities, nondisabled people with power tend to try either to fix disabled people according to nondisabled standards, or they marginalise them, compromising their worth and their safety in society.

We have spent centuries segregating people. Great thinkers, whose ideas endure today, pronounced some natural functions as ‘natural’, equating arbitrary ‘order’ with goodness; while perceptions of natural dysbiosis were labelled ‘unnatural’ and denigrated to ‘disorder’, abnormality, and sin.  

Here we find ourselves in dehumanising territories of supremacist political, religious and social ideologies throughout history. The Nazis persecuted and systematically murdered hundreds of thousands disabled people along with millions of Jews; white supremacist scientific practices fuelled by racist confirmation bias – with no biological basis – were used to justify, propagate and embed pernicious claims of ‘racial inferiority’, and the ‘biological disharmony’ of children of mixed background. Queer people throughout history are dismissed as dysbiotic ‘abominations’ of nature, and continue to live in fear and to suffer humiliation, harm and discrimination.

Intersecting racist, ableist and queerphobic prejudice is designed into all aspects of society, and a culture of worthlessness persists in public conscious and unconscious bias, evidenced throughout history: from celebrated figures such as Virginia Woolf, who described disabled people as ‘imbeciles’; to the ableist comments made by politicians today that betray the lack of humanity, dignity and value that they often feel entitled to attribute to disabled children.

Untangling cultural dysbiosis

The artists at Daedalus Theatre Company have inspired me to question ingrained tropes of dysbiosis that exist in scientific, religious, political and other cultural contexts, that have led us to ultimately minimise, disguise, or even deny the rights and expressions of marginalised people.  

How do we emerge from pernicious, supremacist cultural narratives of dysbiosis that have created marginalisation, engendered fear and bracketed off all forms of divergence? They have made their way into violence against women, girls and nature, upholding Western ideas and white coat medicine, widening the gulf between humans and other aspects of nature.

Nietzsche’s philosophy of aesthetics likens traditional human understandings of natural harmony with Apollo – god of reason, order and beauty; and chaotic disorder to Dionysus – god of ecstasy and insanity. Inspiringly, he thought that while we need both principles, we should use our wills to surrender our sense of self to nature in an intoxicated embrace of dysbiotic creativity!

I suspect it to be neither possible nor desirable to consistently bear (let alone affirm) nature in all its dispassionate, destructive revelry. However, I think we have a duty of care to ourselves, each other and our environment to openly question cultural mirages of socially constructed harmony based on harmful misappropriations of ‘nature’, and to find the courage to celebrate radically inclusive expressions of interdependent identity. 

Can our propensity to care overcome our impulse to dominate?

Can our propensity to care overcome our impulse to dominate? I don’t know, but I am pinning my hopes on our willingness to unlearn dysbiotic practices of entitlement. I hope we can continue to build momentum for climate justice, and learn to renature ourselves in our surroundings in more sophisticated, forest-inspired, collaborations so that future generations – and as many species as we can hold on to – can dance, play and work together to nature’s rhythms.

In the art world, there are interconnecting shoots popping up that teach us to embrace dysbiosis in all its divergent variety, offering us active opportunities to cultivate creative abandon, and loving acceptance from the grassroots.

Artist Spotlight: Paul Burgess

This month’s spotlight is on DYSBIOSIS designer-director and director of Daedalus Theatre Company Paul Burgess, who conceived the project back in 2020 before recruiting a team of creative practitioners last year to delve deeper into social constructions of Nature using a queer and interdisciplinary lens.

Tell us about yourself and your creative practice.

I’m a set and costume designer by training and self-taught in video and interactive digital, which I use in both performance and visual art contexts. I teach on the side, mainly English as a second language, at my partner’s tutorial school, Angkriz, though I’ve also taught on theatre and theatre design courses at various universities. Both feed my creative practice by challenging me in different ways. I also have various voluntary roles, mainly in the area of sustainability. These also feed into my creative work, and include being the coordinator of the Society of British Theatre Designers’s working group on sustainability and a co-director of Ecostage. I’m also on the Environmental Responsibility Subcommittee at Queens Theatre, Hornchurch, where we’re working on DYSBIOSIS. For fun, I play the violin, most often with The Black Smock Band, which connects with the music and storytelling we do as part of our EAST project. It all adds up to one interconnected creative practice.

What does ‘dysbiosis’ mean to you?

I suggested this as a working title for the project, and it seems to have stuck, so I suppose I need to explain myself!

It came initially from I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life by Ed Yong. Having defined dysbiosis as ‘breakdowns in communication between different species – host and symbiont – that live together, ‘ Yong goes on to say: 

Our planet has entered the Anthropocene – a new geological epoch when humanity’s influence is causing global climate change, the loss of wild species, and a drastic decline in the richness of life. Microbes are not exempt. On coral reefs or in human guts, we are disrupting the relationships between microbes and their hosts, often pulling apart species that have been together for millions of years.

I had already been thinking about the way we use Nature to talk about society, often in ways that are divorced from the reality of the natural world,  such as the notion of the body politic, or economic competitiveness being described as Darwinian, or the absurd claim that LGBTQ+ people are unnatural. But what if the metaphorical body politic is suffering from metaphorical dysbiosis?

Were any aspects of the project new to you and, if so, what did you expect coming in?

I’ve never worked with so many directors and writers! I don’t get to do many designer-director-led projects. When I do, I usually work with people who are primarily there as performers, even if many of them write and direct on other projects. We also have lots of creative contributions from local residents. I was a little nervous that we’d have too many proverbial cooks. But our core group has wonderful chemistry, and the work with residents is producing some fantastic stuff. I think we’re going to end up with far more material than we can use, but that’s a good problem to have!

How did you find doing a second week of R&D after some months have passed?

The first R&D week was all about getting a feel for the themes and working out how to collaborate. The sharing at the end was a great first step, but it was essentially a collage of lots of bits of writing with a simple framing device – a lecture going wrong – to hold it together. It was incredibly useful, however, because in the second R&D week, we hit the ground running, and it was an amazingly creative and fruitful experience.

In your own words, what is devised theatre? And how did it apply in this project?

I’d say it’s basically about creating the work as a company rather than having a writer create a script. More personally, I think it’s also about questioning the hierarchies normalised within theatre-making, with the writer and director sometimes having tremendous power over other people of equal talent.

I also think a designer-director can bring something unique to devised projects. I would say that, of course! But it’s an observation I’ve come to through over two decades of experience. My design process puts careful research and dramaturgical integrity ahead of spectacle. My goal is to find the ‘logic’ of the piece, which the director may or may not have already established, and then to create the right frame to hold and enable that. In devised work, finding the logic and its corresponding frame is the key to making a coherent piece of work and to creating a rehearsal room situation where people can experiment and pursue their own lines of enquiry. I could talk about this for hours, but if you want an example, A PLACE AT THE TABLE is where this connection between the design process and the kind of devising I wanted to do really clicked into place.

How did you find working collaboratively with creative practitioners from different disciplines?

I love it, especially when the roles are fluid. It creates a genuinely creative space. It’s not always easy. Sometimes, you need to draw a line because you have to respect people’s expertise. For example, I might suggest a sound idea that a composer knows won’t work. So it has to be managed carefully. But as long as you get the balance right, it’s great.

I’m currently doing an MSc in Green Building, and one of the fantastic things about that is being with lots of people from very different backgrounds. It made me realise how much time I spend with other people who work in the arts, and I’ve had some great conversations with people from backgrounds ranging from sheep farming to architectural technology. Interestingly, some of my devising experience has come in handy for course group work, as I know how to create a situation that’s conducive to collaboration and co-creation.

How have you found it working in the Outer East London/South Essex area?

I’m keen to anchor the work in the place where we’re making it. I’m from Harlow, in the west of Essex, and now live in the East End, where my Mum’s family lived for several generations after coming from Eastern Europe. So I feel right at home even though I’m not actually from either South Essex or Outer East London. There’s a kind of shared identity, formed from the movement of people out of the old East End to the suburbs and beyond. My dad is from Mersea Island on the Essex coast, which is a different kind of place in many ways, but I was vividly reminded of its landscapes when we visited Rainham Marshes. 

What are you currently excited about creatively? 

I’m pretty excited about how queerness is being brought to the fore in Daedalus’ work. We’ve been creeping around the edge of this for a while – there was definitely a queer aspect to MOBILE INCITEMENT, for example – but we’ve not previously made it central to our creative approach. In DYSBIOSIS, we’ve embraced it fully, and the lens of queer ecology has brought about so many fresh perspectives. These come partly from questioning the way we impose our heteronormative, binary-gendered assumptions onto Nature (which is, of course, full of non- and multi-binary queerness – especially fungi!). But they also come from thinking about how much more there is to Nature, in all its joyfulness and abundance, than just passing on genes. I’m trying to get my head around more abstract ideas too, like Timothy Morton’s claim that queer ecology is in opposition to individualism and Donna Haraway’s assertion that ‘We are compost, not posthuman; we inhabit the humusities, not the humanities. Philosophically and materially, I am a compostist, not a posthumanist.’ (Humus is soil produced by decayed matter, in case you don’t know.)

Can you recommend a book that relates to the themes in DYSBIOSIS?

I’ve been doing a lot of reading for this project, including Morton and Haraway. I have to admit I find them pretty difficult, although worth the effort. But here I want to mention the books I most enjoyed reading for research, and I’m sorry I can’t pick one! Ed Yong’s I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life is a fantastic book on the world at microscopic level. Robin Wall Kimmerer’s Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants explores her journey to connect Western science with indigenous knowledge and is a modern eco-classic. And be warned, Entangled Life: How Fungi Make Our Worlds, Change Our Minds and Shape Our Futures by Merlin Sheldrake may turn you into a fungi obsessive!


Top image: photo by Rehan Jamil

Paul filming lichen in a Dysbiosis R&D at Queens Theatre, Hornchurch. Photo: Hannah Davis